![]() ![]() I still have a bad taste in my mouth when I went to SWX2017 and then ran into a problem that forced me to revert to 2016 and all the files I had to recreate. I have also learned that some of the things they make a big deal out of aren't fully developed or are just somebody trying to make it seem like a great thing, but in reality aren't that big a deal, at least not for me. I see some things that look like they would be nice to use, but I have lived without them and managed just fine so I do not feel the need to rush into them. I don't have any significant ideas for improvements (but that is NOT the reason I do not participate in the TTL anymore - that is a different issue entirely). Version Update to SP3.0 or higher - I've become mostly satisfied with the reports of stability and the version has a few new features I'd like to start using. SP Update - If I've had a problem that is addressed by the SP. ![]() Version Update - Someone I am exchanging files with is on a later version (2023) than me (2021) and I need to open their files.Ģ. My attitude toward updates is summed up as "Not unless there is a compelling reason".ġ. Perhaps they are just trying to soften us up to get used to more. This just invites the conclusion I came up with. That does paint a little different picture, but I also think that numbering system is lousy The EV is now SP0 and the full non-EV is SP0.1. 1 happening since 2021 or 2020.īut then they'll just point to the Cloud and say "That's what you want!" OR maybe they should just scratch this whole SP thing and just release hotfixes of a "complete product", rather then SP0 through 5 with all those. Instead of SP standing for Service Pack, maybe it should stand for Service Patch. But that just makes this even more of a WOW of disappointment that this "patch" is even necessary. I have met the top people in charge of quality at SWX and I have great respect for their personal integrity. I understand it is not possible to test for every possible hardware configuration, software setting, and user technique. ![]() I understand that the software gets more complicated, that dealing with legacy code is very difficult. ![]() Here we have one right after the initial release, SP0.1. I can recall maybe five or six times that has happened. Wow! In the 28 year history of SWX, or more specifically, in the 20+ years they've been doing numbered SP's, there have only been a few times that I can recall where a. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |